Don't steal emoji who's shortcodes have dots or colons in their name
Mastodon at the very least seems to prevent the creation of emoji with dots in their name (and refuses to accept them in federation). It feels like being cautious in what we accept is reasonable here. Colons are the emoji separator and so obviously should be blocked. Perhaps instead of filtering out things like this we should just do a regex match on `[a-zA-Z0-9_-]`? But that's plausibly a decision for another day Perhaps we should also have a centralised "is this a valid emoji shortcode?" function
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d94476dd6
commit
b387f4a1c1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ def filter(%{"object" => %{"emoji" => foreign_emojis, "actor" => actor}} = messa
|
||||||
new_emojis =
|
new_emojis =
|
||||||
foreign_emojis
|
foreign_emojis
|
||||||
|> Enum.reject(fn {shortcode, _url} -> shortcode in installed_emoji end)
|
|> Enum.reject(fn {shortcode, _url} -> shortcode in installed_emoji end)
|
||||||
|> Enum.reject(fn {shortcode, _url} -> String.contains?(shortcode, ["/", "\\"]) end)
|
|> Enum.reject(fn {shortcode, _url} -> String.contains?(shortcode, ["/", "\\", ".", ":"]) end)
|
||||||
|> Enum.filter(fn {shortcode, _url} ->
|
|> Enum.filter(fn {shortcode, _url} ->
|
||||||
reject_emoji? =
|
reject_emoji? =
|
||||||
[:mrf_steal_emoji, :rejected_shortcodes]
|
[:mrf_steal_emoji, :rejected_shortcodes]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue