[privacy model] investigation of signed mode #110

New Issue

Closed

opened 2022-07-24 17:59:29 +00:00 by floatingghost · 1 comment

floatingghost commented

2022-07-24 17:59:29 +00:00

Owner

both misskey and mastodon have the concept of a "signed fetch only" mode, in which public objects/collections do not allow anyone but other instances to fetch them.

whilst it is entirely in scope to relay public statuses around, and thus this will not fully solve the issue, we should investigate how difficult it would be to ensure that AP doesn't get fetched unauthenticated

both misskey and mastodon have the concept of a "signed fetch only" mode, in which public objects/collections do not allow anyone but other instances to fetch them. whilst it is entirely in scope to relay public statuses around, and thus this will not fully solve the issue, we should investigate how difficult it would be to ensure that AP doesn't get fetched unauthenticated

floatingghost commented

2022-07-26 10:04:47 +00:00

Author

Owner

already exists, very poorly documented

added to admin-fe via #116

already exists, very poorly documented added to admin-fe via #116

floatingghost closed this issue

2022-07-26 10:04:48 +00:00

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: AkkomaGang/akkoma#110

No description provided.