[frontends] allow for arbitrary frontend settings #12

New issue

Open

opened 2022-06-24 16:11:44 +00:00 by floatingghost · 4 comments

floatingghost commented

2022-06-24 16:11:44 +00:00

Owner

currently akkoma supports only :primary and :admin settings for the frontend - this means you can have only one user-facing frontend at a time

this should be expanded to allow any number of frontends mounted at a given path - in the style of masto-fe being hosted at /web

this will need some consideration given that most frontends assume they are running at / - do we need a specific build that does not assume that? i wouldn't be keen on rewriting anything dynamically

currently akkoma supports only `:primary` and `:admin` settings for the frontend - this means you can have only one user-facing frontend at a time this should be expanded to allow any number of frontends mounted at a given path - in the style of masto-fe being hosted at `/web` this will need some consideration given that most frontends assume they are running at `/` - do we need a specific build that does not assume that? i wouldn't be keen on rewriting anything dynamically

floatingghost added the

enhancement

configuration

labels 2022-06-24 16:13:40 +00:00

floatingghost added this to the 3.0 release milestone 2022-06-26 17:25:02 +00:00

floatingghost commented

2022-06-28 09:27:57 +00:00

Author

Owner

i had the solution to this revealed to me in a dream last night

subdomains

SUBDOMAINS

how could i not have seen it

everything wants to run on /, so let's... let it

reverse proxies can have n domains, and we can probably use phoenix to route based on it

i had the solution to this revealed to me in a dream last night subdomains SUBDOMAINS how could i not have seen it everything wants to run on `/`, so let's... let it reverse proxies can have n domains, and we can probably use phoenix to route based on it

Ghost commented

2022-07-21 19:17:13 +00:00

close?

floatingghost commented

2022-07-21 20:09:30 +00:00

Author

Owner

close as in "should we close this?" or "are you close?"

i got it working but i'm yet to find a satisfying flow to get it to work

close as in "should we close this?" or "are you close?" i got it working but i'm yet to find a satisfying flow to get it to work

jmjl commented

2022-12-04 08:46:55 +00:00

close as in "should we close this?" or "are you close?"

i got it working but i'm yet to find a satisfying flow to get it to work

How close is this to getting made a feature?

> close as in "should we close this?" or "are you close?" > > i got it working but i'm yet to find a satisfying flow to get it to work How close is this to getting made a feature?