Turns out that replies don't have to have the type comment. Changed handling
of those to depend on presence of <thr:in-reply-to /> instead
This commit is contained in:
parent
111f2a1d48
commit
66a2107527
1 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -26,12 +26,14 @@ class ProcessFeedService < BaseService
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
status = Status.new(uri: activity_id(entry), url: activity_link(entry), account: account, text: content(entry), created_at: published(entry), updated_at: updated(entry))
|
status = Status.new(uri: activity_id(entry), url: activity_link(entry), account: account, text: content(entry), created_at: published(entry), updated_at: updated(entry))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if object_type(entry) == :comment && verb(entry) == :post
|
if verb(entry) == :share
|
||||||
add_reply!(entry, status)
|
|
||||||
elsif verb(entry) == :share
|
|
||||||
add_reblog!(entry, status)
|
add_reblog!(entry, status)
|
||||||
elsif verb(entry) == :post
|
elsif verb(entry) == :post
|
||||||
|
if thread_id(entry).nil?
|
||||||
add_post!(entry, status)
|
add_post!(entry, status)
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
add_reply!(entry, status)
|
||||||
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# If we added a status, go through accounts it mentions and create respective relations
|
# If we added a status, go through accounts it mentions and create respective relations
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue