Conflicts:
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Upstream changed a header but we had different default headers.
Applied the same change, and also dropped HSTS headers redundant with
Rails'.
* Remove support for OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN
Fixes#15959
Introduced in #6540, OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN allowed skipping the log-in form
to instead redirect to the external OmniAuth login provider.
However, it did not prevent the log-in form on /about introduced by #10232 from
appearing, and completely broke with the introduction of #15228.
As I restoring that previous log-in flow without introducing a security
vulnerability may require extensive care and knowledge of how OmniAuth works,
this commit removes support for OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN instead for the time
being.
* Add OMNIAUTH_ONLY environment variable to enforce external log-in only
* Disable user registration when OMNIAUTH_ONLY is set to true
* Replace log-in links When OMNIAUTH_ONLY is set with exactly one OmniAuth provider
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
- `app/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml`
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/accounts_helper.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/accounts/_header.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/directories/index.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Small markup change in glitch-soc, on a line that has been modified by
upstream. Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated copyright year, we don't mention it so kept our version.
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
Not really a conflict, upstream change (removing the spam checker) too close
to glitch-soc changes. Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Same.
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Same.
- `app/views/admin/settings/edit.html.haml`:
Same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Same.
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a default HTTP header, but we have
extra headers in glitch-soc.
Added the header.
Conflicts:
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Conflict caused by us having a distinc Direct timeline.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Conflict between glitch-soc's variable character limit and upstream
refactoring that part of the code.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/relationships_controller.rb`:
Upstream changed a line too close to a glitch-soc only line related to
glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes accordingly.
Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Upstream has changed how Tesseract.js gets included and dropped a dependency.
The conflict is caused by glitch-soc having different code due to its
theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Upstream refactor/code style change in a place we replaced upstream's
repo URL with ours.
Ported upstram changes, keeping our repo URL.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dropped dependencies, one of which was textually too close to
a glitch-soc-specific dependency. Not a real conflict.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc having to take care of local-only
pinned toots in that controller.
Took upstream's changes and restored the local-only special
handling.
- `app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb`:
Minor conflicts due to the theming system, applied upstream
changes, adapted the following two files for glitch-soc's
theming system:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc having to handle local-only
toots specially. Applied upstream changes and restored
the local-only special handling.
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/index.html.haml`:
Minor conflict due to the theming system.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
Conflicts:
- Gemfile
- app/controllers/api/v1/search_controller.rb
Conflict because we changed the number of default results to be
configurable
- app/lib/settings/scoped_settings.rb
Addition of a new “noindex” site-wide setting,
conflict due to our change of the two other site-wide settings
(default flavour and skin instead of theme)
- spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb
Addition of a new “noindex” site-wide setting,
conflict due to our change of the two other site-wide settings
(default flavour and skin instead of theme)
Conflicts:
- app/views/admin/pending_accounts/index.html.haml
No real conflict, upstream changes too close to glitch-specific
theming system changes.
- config/navigation.rb
Upstream redesigned the settings navigation, took those changes
and re-inserted the flavours menu.
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
* Revert "Fix some icon names changed by the Font Awesome 5. (#8796)"
This reverts commit 3f9ec3de82.
* Revert "Migrate to font-awesome 5.0. (#8799)"
This reverts commit 8bae14591b.
* Revert "Fix some icons names, unavailable in fontawesome5 (free license). (#8792)"
This reverts commit b9c727a945.
* Revert "Update the icon name changed by the Font Awesome 5. (#8776)"
This reverts commit 17af4d27da.
* Revert "Add bot icon to bot avatars and migrate to newer version of Font Awesome (#8484)"
This reverts commit 4b794e134d.
Conflicts:
app/views/layouts/application.html.haml
Edited:
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml
Conflict wasn't really one, just two changes too close to one another.
Edition was to adapt the class names for themes to class names for
skins and flavours.
Also edited app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml to strip the
duplicate admin pack inclusion thing.
* Add more granular OAuth scopes
* Add human-readable descriptions of the new scopes
* Ensure new scopes look good on the app UI
* Add tests
* Group scopes in screen and color-code dangerous ones
* Fix wrong extra scope
* Use table for statuses in report
* Display reported account and reporter in the same table
* Split accounts and general report info into two tables again
* Redesign report statuses table, notes, merge notes and action log
* Remove unused translations
* Fix code style issue
* Fix code style issue
* Fix code style issue
