No description
Find a file
2017-06-16 23:19:49 +02:00
config core: disable Credo and Dialyzer in mix_test_watch config 2016-11-27 15:01:28 +01:00
lib Add and revise documentation of RDF.Description 2017-06-16 23:03:44 +02:00
priv/vocabs core: vocabulary namespace rewrite 2017-03-12 14:30:59 +01:00
src core: N-Quads serialization decoder 2017-04-11 02:09:35 +02:00
test Don't support RDF.Graph. and RDF.Dataset.put with a list of descriptions 2017-06-16 23:19:49 +02:00
.editorconfig Add .editorconfig 2017-06-11 17:17:05 +02:00
.gitignore mix new rdf_core --module RDF.Core 2016-09-30 16:36:50 +02:00
LICENSE.md Add some basic project metadata 2016-09-30 16:51:59 +02:00
mix.exs Rename the app to rdf 2017-06-11 17:23:58 +02:00
mix.lock Remove umbrella settings 2017-06-11 17:11:05 +02:00
README.md Rename the app to rdf 2017-06-11 17:23:58 +02:00

RDF.ex

An implementation of the RDF data model in Elixir.

Installation

The Hex package can be installed as usual:

  1. Add rdf to your list of dependencies in mix.exs:
```elixir
def deps do
  [{:rdf, "~> 0.1.0"}]
end
```
  1. Ensure rdf is started before your application:
```elixir
def application do
  [applications: [:rdf]]
end
```

Introduction

The RDF standard defines a graph data model for distributed information on the web. A RDF graph is a set of statements aka RDF triples consistenting of a three nodes:

  1. a subject node with an IRI or a blank node,
  2. a predicate node with the IRI of a RDF property,
  3. an object nodes with an IRI, a blank node or a RDF literal value.

Let's see how the different types of nodes are represented with RDF.ex in Elixir.

URIs

Although the RDF standards speaks of IRIs, an internationalized generalization of URIs, RDF.ex currently supports only URIs. They are represented with Elixirs builtin URI struct. Its a pragmatic, temporary decision, which will be subject to changes very probably, in favour of a more dedicated representation of IRIs specialised for its usage within RDF data. See this issue for progress on this matter.

The RDF module defines a handy constructor function RDF.uri/1:

RDF.uri("http://www.example.com/foo")

Besides being a little shorter than URI.parse and better importable, it will provide a gentlier migration to the mentioned, more optimized URI-representation in RDF.ex.

An URI can also be created with the ~I sigil:

~I<http://www.example.com/foo>

But there's an even shorter way notation for providing URI literals.

Vocabularies

RDF.ex supports modules which represent a RDF vocabulary as a RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace and comes with predefined modules for some fundamentals vocabularies in the RDF.NS module. Furthermore, the rdf_vocab package contains predefined RDF.Vocabulary.Namespaces for popular vocabularies.

These RDF.Vocabulary.Namespaces (a special case of a RDF.Namespace) allows for something similar to QNames of XML: a qualified atom with a Elixir module can be resolved to an URI.

There are two types of terms in a RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace which are resolved differently:

  1. Capitalized terms are by standard Elixir semantics modules names, i.e. atoms. In all places in RDF.ex, where an URI is expected, you can use atoms qualified with a RDF.Namespace directly, but if you want to resolve it manually, you can pass the RDF.Namespace qualified atom to RDF.uri.
  2. Lowercased terms for RDF properties are represented as functions on a RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace module and return the URI directly, but since RDF.uri can also handle URIs directly, you can safely and consistently use it with lowercased terms too.
iex> import RDF, only: [uri: 1]
iex> alias RDF.NS.{RDFS}
iex> RDFS.Class
RDF.NS.RDFS.Class
iex> uri(RDFS.Class)
%URI{authority: "www.w3.org", fragment: "Class", host: "www.w3.org",
 path: "/2000/01/rdf-schema", port: 80, query: nil, scheme: "http",
 userinfo: nil}
iex> RDFS.subClassOf
%URI{authority: "www.w3.org", fragment: "subClassOf", host: "www.w3.org",
 path: "/2000/01/rdf-schema", port: 80, query: nil, scheme: "http",
 userinfo: nil}
iex> uri(RDFS.subClassOf)
%URI{authority: "www.w3.org", fragment: "subClassOf", host: "www.w3.org",
 path: "/2000/01/rdf-schema", port: 80, query: nil, scheme: "http",
 userinfo: nil}

As this example shows the namespace modules can be easily aliased. When required they can be also aliased to different a different module. Since the RDF vocabulary namespace in RDF.NS.RDF can't be aliased, since it would clash with top-level RDF module, all of its elements can be accessed directly from the RDF module (without an alias).

iex> import RDF, only: [uri: 1]
iex> RDF.type

iex> uri(RDF.Property)

This way of expressing URIs has the additional benefit, that the existence of the referenced URI is checked at compile time, i.e. whenever a term is used that is not part of the resp. vocabulary an error is raised by the Elixir compiler (unless the vocabulary namespace is non-strict; see below).

For terms not adhering to the capitalization rules (properties lowercased, non-properties capitalized) or containing characters not allowed within atoms, these namespace define aliases accordingly. If not sure, you can look in the documentation or the vocabulary namespace definition.

Description DSL

The functions on the vocabulary namespace modules for properties, also are also available in description builder variant, which accepts subject and objects as arguments.

RDF.type(EX.Foo, EX.Bar)

If you want to state multiple statements with the same subject and predicate, you can either pass the objects as a list or, if there are not more not five of them, as additional arguments:

RDF.type(EX.Foo, EX.Bar, EX.Baz)
EX.foo(EX.Bar, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6])

In combination with Elixirs pipe operators this leads to a description DSL which resembles Turtle:

EX.Foo
|> RDF.type(EX.Bar)
|> EX.baz(1, 2, 3)

The produced statements are returned by this function as a RDF.Description structure which will be described below.

Defining vocabulary namespaces

There are two basic ways to define a namespace for a vocabulary:

  1. You can define all terms manually.
  2. You can extract the terms from existing RDF data for URIs of resources under the specified base URI.

It's recommended to introduce a dedicated module for the defined namespace. On this module you'll use RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace and define your vocabulary namespaces with the defvocab macro.

A vocabulary namespace with manually defined terms can be defined in this way like that:

defmodule YourApp.NS do
  use RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace

  defvocab EX,
    base_uri: "http://www.example.com/ns/",
    terms: ~w[Foo bar]
    
end

The base_uri argument with the URI prefix of all the terms in the defined vocabulary is required and expects a valid URI ending with either a "/" or a "#". Terms will be checked for invalid character at compile-time and will raise a compile error. This handling of invalid characters can be modified with the invalid_characters options, which is by default set to :fail. By setting it explicitly to :warn only warnings will be raised or it can be turned off completely with :ignore.

A vocabulary namespace with extracted terms can be by either providing RDF data directly with the data option or from serialized RDF data file in the priv/vocabs directory:

defmodule YourApp.NS do
  use RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace

  defvocab EX,
    base_uri: "http://www.example.com/ns/",
    file: "your_vocabulary.nt"
    
end

Currently only NTriple and NQuad files are supported at this place.

During compilation the terms will be validated, if they are properly capitalized (properties lowercased, non-properties capitalized), by analyzing the schema description of the resp. resource in the given data. This validation behaviour can be modified with the case_violations options, which is by default set to :warn. By setting it explicitly to :fail errors will be raised during compilation or it can be turned off with :ignore.

When the terms contain invalid characters or violate the capitalization rules, you can fix these by defining aliases for these terms with the alias option and a keyword list:

defmodule YourApp.NS do
  use RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace

  defvocab EX,
    base_uri: "http://www.example.com/ns/",
    terms: ~w[example-term],
    alias: [example_term: "example-term"]

end

Though strictly discouraged, a vocabulary namespace can be defined as non-strict with the strict option set to false. A non-strict vocabulary doesn't require any terms to be defined (although they can). A term is resolved dynamically at runtime by simple concatentating the term with the base uri of the resp. namespace module:

defmodule YourApp.NS do
  use RDF.Vocabulary.Namespace

  defvocab EX,
    base_uri: "http://www.example.com/ns/",
    terms: [], 
    strict: false
end

iex> import RDF, only: [uri: 1]
iex> alias YourApp.NS.{EX}
iex> uri(EX.Foo)
%URI{authority: "www.example.com", fragment: nil, host: "www.example.com",
 path: "/ns/Foo", port: 80, query: nil, scheme: "http", userinfo: nil}
iex> EX.bar
%URI{authority: "www.example.com", fragment: nil, host: "www.example.com",
 path: "/ns/bar", port: 80, query: nil, scheme: "http", userinfo: nil}
iex> EX.Foo |> EX.bar(EX.Baz)
#RDF.Description{subject: ~I<http://www.example.com/ns/Foo>
     ~I<http://www.example.com/ns/bar>
         ~I<http://www.example.com/ns/Baz>}

Blank nodes

TODO

Literals

Literals are used for values such as strings, numbers, and dates. They can be untyped, languaged-tagged or typed. In general they are created with the RDF.Literal.new constructor function or its alias function RDF.literal:

RDF.Literal.new("foo")
RDF.literal("foo")

The actual value can be accessed via the value struct field:

RDF.literal("foo").value

An untyped literal can also be created with the ~L sigil:

import RDF.Sigils
~L"foo"

A language-tagged literal can be created by providing the language option with a BCP47-conform language or by adding the language as a modifier to the ~L sigil:

RDF.literal("foo", language: "en")

import RDF.Sigils
~L"foo"en

Note: Only languages without subtags are supported as modifiers of the ~L sigil, i.e. if you want to use en-US as a language tag, you would have to use RDF.literal or RDF.Literal.new.

A typed literal can be created by providing the datatype option with an URI of a datatype. Most of the time this will be an XML schema datatype:

RDF.literal("42", datatype: XSD.integer)

It is also possible to create a typed literal by using a native Elixir non-string value, for which the following datatype mapping will be applied:

Elixir datatype XSD datatype
boolean xsd:boolean
integer xsd:integer
float xsd:double
Time xsd:time
Date xsd:date
DateTime xsd:dateTime
NaiveDateTime xsd:dateTime

So the former example literal can be created equivalently like this:

RDF.literal(42)

For all of these known datatypes the value struct field contains the native Elixir value representation according to this mapping. When a known XSD datatype is specified the given value will be converted automatically if needed and possible.

iex> RDF.literal(42, datatype: XSD.double).value
42.0

For all of these supported XSD datatypes RDF.Datatypes are available, which are modules that allow the creation of RDF.Literals with the respective datatype:

iex> RDF.Double.new("0042").value
42.0
iex> RDF.Double.new(42).value
42.0

The RDF.Literal.valid?/1 function checks if a given literal is valid according to the XML schema datatype specification.

iex> RDF.Literal.valid? RDF.Integer.new("42")
true
iex> RDF.Literal.valid? RDF.Integer.new("foo")
false

A RDF literal is bound to the lexical form of the initially given value. This lexical representation can be retrieved with the RDF.Literal.lexical/1 function:

iex> RDF.Literal.lexical RDF.Integer.new("0042")
"0042"
iex> RDF.Literal.lexical RDF.Integer.new(42)
"42"

Although two literals might have the same value, they are not equal when they don't have the same lexical form:

iex> RDF.Integer.new("0042").value == RDF.Integer.new("42").value
true
iex> RDF.Integer.new("0042") == RDF.Integer.new("42")
false

The RDF.Literal.canonical/1 function returns the given literal with its canonical lexical form according its datatype:

iex> RDF.Integer.new("0042") |> RDF.Literal.canonical |> RDF.Literal.lexical
"42"
iex> RDF.Literal.canonical(RDF.Integer.new("0042")) == 
     RDF.Literal.canonical(RDF.Integer.new("42"))
true

Note: Although you can create any XSD datatype by using the resp. URI with the datatype option of RDF.Literal.new, not all of them support the validation and conversion behaviour of RDF.Literals and the value field simple contains the initially given value unvalidated and unconverted. See this project for the missing XSD datatypes.

RDF data structures

Statements

Descriptions

Graphs

Datasets

Multiple graphs in an RDF document constitute an RDF dataset. An RDF dataset may have multiple named graphs and at most one unnamed ("default") graph.

RDF.Data protocol

Serializations

Getting help

  • Hex
  • Slack

Development

Contributing

see CONTRIBUTING for details.

(c) 2017 Marcel Otto. MIT Licensed, see LICENSE for details.