Redo desktop nav, add options for site name and favicon #83

Merged
floatingghost merged 11 commits from eris/pleroma-fe:desktop-nav-redo into develop 2022-08-14 23:24:59 +00:00
Contributor

Changes include:
-Favicon being added to the nav bar
-Router links for the timelines, interactions, lists, and bookmarks
-Active indicators for which timeline you're on, similar to the timeline menu
-Change bell to bolt for interactions (the bell for notifications is in tact, don't worry)
-New user option to hide favicon in top panel
-New user option to hide site name in top panel for desktop and mobile nav, making the admin setting unnecessary

Why:
-The current desktop nav is a lot of useless empty space! This makes use of that, so you don't have to have the timeline menu stickied or scroll to the nav panel menu.

This PR is complete and ready for review

Changes include: -Favicon being added to the nav bar -Router links for the timelines, interactions, lists, and bookmarks -Active indicators for which timeline you're on, similar to the timeline menu -Change bell to bolt for interactions (the bell for notifications is in tact, don't worry) -New user option to hide favicon in top panel -New user option to hide site name in top panel for desktop and mobile nav, making the admin setting unnecessary Why: -The current desktop nav is a lot of useless empty space! This makes use of that, so you don't have to have the timeline menu stickied or scroll to the nav panel menu. This PR is complete and ready for review
eris force-pushed desktop-nav-redo from d83fb00a24 to a0de673cc0 2022-07-30 22:51:29 +00:00 Compare

this looks nice, one nitpick might be that the icons are a tiny bit too close together, a margin of 0.7em (currently 0.15em) might make it easier for, say, tablets to not misclick

difference:

0.7:
image

0.15:
image

this looks nice, one nitpick might be that the icons are a _tiny_ bit too close together, a margin of 0.7em (currently 0.15em) might make it easier for, say, tablets to not misclick difference: 0.7: ![image](/attachments/fb46391c-3053-45e8-8e60-02288d5ec088) 0.15: ![image](/attachments/42b4c1fc-e96a-4358-8228-bff931e89298)
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-01 17:07:21 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
3518ae1cf5
Update nav icon spacing to prevent misclicks
Author
Contributor

this looks nice, one nitpick might be that the icons are a tiny bit too close together, a margin of 0.7em (currently 0.15em) might make it easier for, say, tablets to not misclick

Done

> this looks nice, one nitpick might be that the icons are a _tiny_ bit too close together, a margin of 0.7em (currently 0.15em) might make it easier for, say, tablets to not misclick Done
eris added the
Feature
label 2022-08-01 17:09:22 +00:00
First-time contributor

I like this idea, but what if we were to move the timeline links to the timeline panel header? (similar to how misskey has it)

This would free up the left side of the top bar in case people want to do something more elaborate with the logo without it having to fight for space there.

Edit: also keep in mind that pleroma-fe has an option to move the logo to the left side; perhaps having the favicon there too might be too much clutter. Maybe better if the favicon is an option?

I like this idea, but what if we were to move the timeline links to the timeline panel header? (similar to how misskey has it) This would free up the left side of the top bar in case people want to do something more elaborate with the logo without it having to fight for space there. Edit: also keep in mind that pleroma-fe has an option to move the logo to the left side; perhaps having the favicon there too might be too much clutter. Maybe better if the favicon is an option?
Author
Contributor

in case people want to do something more elaborate with the logo without it having to fight for space there.

there's plenty of space. if the window gets any smaller than what FG screened, it's going to switch to the mobile nav anyway which uses its own nav panel

Edit: also keep in mind that pleroma-fe has an option to move the logo to the left side

Does it? I don't see that option in akkoma at all

Maybe better if the favicon is an option?

I was also going to implement options to make both the favicon and the instance name hideable by the user, and then the admins could set the default for that option, but figured i'd wait until this PR went through unless we want it as part of it.

>in case people want to do something more elaborate with the logo without it having to fight for space there. there's plenty of space. if the window gets any smaller than what FG screened, it's going to switch to the mobile nav anyway which uses its own nav panel > Edit: also keep in mind that pleroma-fe has an option to move the logo to the left side Does it? I don't see that option in akkoma at all > Maybe better if the favicon is an option? I was also going to implement options to make both the favicon and the instance name hideable by the user, and then the admins could set the default for that option, but figured i'd wait until this PR went through unless we want it as part of it.
First-time contributor

Edit: also keep in mind that pleroma-fe has an option to move the logo to the left side

Does it? I don't see that option in akkoma at all

See static/config.json, line 15:

"logoLeft": false,

This setting moves the logo to the left where the instance name is. I think it can also be set from admin-fe. Anyway if the favicon will be an option, I don't think this will be much of a problem.

> > Edit: also keep in mind that pleroma-fe has an option to move the logo to the left side > > Does it? I don't see that option in akkoma at all See `static/config.json`, line 15: ``` "logoLeft": false, ``` This setting moves the logo to the left where the instance name is. I think it can also be set from admin-fe. Anyway if the favicon will be an option, I don't think this will be much of a problem.
Author
Contributor
"logoLeft": false,

hmm that may be a remnant of upstream pleroma-fe, or a feature they decided not to implement, as the option isn't present in akkoma-fe in src/modules/config.json or admin-fe here, but I see the line in the static/config.json file you mention. Pleroma unfortunately has lots of little ghosty remnants like that with how many people work on it

I'll add the site name and favicon options into this PR in a bit

> ``` > "logoLeft": false, > ``` hmm that may be a remnant of upstream pleroma-fe, or a feature they decided not to implement, as the option isn't present in akkoma-fe in `src/modules/config.json` or admin-fe here, but I see the line in the `static/config.json` file you mention. Pleroma unfortunately has lots of little ghosty remnants like that with how many people work on it I'll add the site name and favicon options into this PR in a bit
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-01 23:04:06 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
f7222c9c83
Add user options to hide instance favicon and name
Author
Contributor

Alright ready for re-review @floatingghost

I added user options for site name and site favicon. In the screenshot, I have the favicon enabled and the site name hidden

Alright ready for re-review @floatingghost I added user options for site name and site favicon. In the screenshot, I have the favicon enabled and the site name hidden
eris force-pushed desktop-nav-redo from 19f7d24d8d to f7222c9c83 2022-08-01 23:20:46 +00:00 Compare
Author
Contributor

Sorry ignore the above commits, I fixed it. Was trying to address the This pull request has changes conflicting with the target branch but I figured that out in the next commit here:

Sorry ignore the above commits, I fixed it. Was trying to address the `This pull request has changes conflicting with the target branch` but I figured that out in the next commit here:
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-02 06:24:54 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
b473ac8f57
Resolve i18n conflict
eris changed title from Redo desktop nav and change bell to bolt for interactions to Redo desktop nav, add options for site name and favicon 2022-08-02 21:40:20 +00:00

the basis is ok, but i think i agree with fristi that moving to the timeline panel feels slightly more natural - otherwise we have 3 different ways to get to the same page

looks like this:

image

diff @ alt-nav

thunks?

the basis is ok, but i think i agree with fristi that moving to the timeline panel feels slightly more natural - otherwise we have 3 different ways to get to the same page looks like this: ![image](/attachments/89877b71-39a2-4e87-8702-6754098e0652) diff @ alt-nav thunks?
First-time contributor

Only thing I would change is to swap the title and the buttons around, but I guess that's just a minor detail. Either way is fine for me.

Only thing I would change is to swap the title and the buttons around, but I guess that's just a minor detail. Either way is fine for me.

ehh, timeline name overflows on mobile for this variant

will have to scale

ehh, timeline name overflows on mobile for this variant will have to scale
Author
Contributor

the basis is ok, but i think i agree with fristi that moving to the timeline panel feels slightly more natural - otherwise we have 3 different ways to get to the same page

looks like this:

image

diff @ alt-nav

thunks?

Dont think I'm a fan of that one, this would mean having to have two top panels basically, requiring the stickied headers and leaving the top panel mostly empty space.

> the basis is ok, but i think i agree with fristi that moving to the timeline panel feels slightly more natural - otherwise we have 3 different ways to get to the same page > > > looks like this: > > ![image](/attachments/89877b71-39a2-4e87-8702-6754098e0652) > > diff @ alt-nav > > thunks? Dont think I'm a fan of that one, this would mean having to have two top panels basically, requiring the stickied headers and leaving the top panel mostly empty space.

hm, whilst yes the top panel is empty space, i don't think switching timelines is massively used as a regular activity once scrolling

my "market research" shows people are about 50/50 split on it as well

suffering

might just have to make a call here :notlikeblob:

i'll use my in-panel headers for a bit and see if i prefer them but it's a toss-up for sure

hm, whilst yes the top panel is empty space, i don't think switching timelines is _massively_ used as a regular activity once scrolling my "market research" shows people are about 50/50 split on it as well suffering might just have to make a call here :notlikeblob: i'll use my in-panel headers for a bit and see if i prefer them but it's a toss-up for sure

ok, i think i prefer the on-panel nav

but i'll patch over it to let you run a branch without the commit for minimal messing, so i'll merge this - maybe we can make it a config thing in the future since the poll i ran was darn near 50/50

any chance the locale conflict can be resolved and then i'll hit ze button?

ok, i think i prefer the on-panel nav but i'll patch over it to let you run a branch without the commit for minimal messing, so i'll merge this - maybe we can make it a config thing in the future since the poll i ran was darn near 50/50 any chance the locale conflict can be resolved and then i'll hit ze button?
Author
Contributor

ok, i think i prefer the on-panel nav

but i'll patch over it to let you run a branch without the commit for minimal messing, so i'll merge this - maybe we can make it a config thing in the future since the poll i ran was darn near 50/50

any chance the locale conflict can be resolved and then i'll hit ze button?

I don't mind adding the option into this PR and letting admins/users choose if you'd rather do it that way? Your way looks good for mobile users, and more options never hurt. I try to err on the side of "let users decide everything" with disqordia anyway.

> ok, i think i prefer the on-panel nav > > but i'll patch over it to let you run a branch without the commit for minimal messing, so i'll merge this - maybe we can make it a config thing in the future since the poll i ran was darn near 50/50 > > any chance the locale conflict can be resolved and then i'll hit ze button? I don't mind adding the option into this PR and letting admins/users choose if you'd rather do it that way? Your way looks good for mobile users, and more options never hurt. I try to err on the side of "let users decide everything" with disqordia anyway.

if you wanna, go for it

i was thinking that it might be a big change

but if you want to give it a shot, i've pushed my changes to the alt-nav branch, so you shooould be able to interpolate between the two branches

if you wanna, go for it i was thinking that it might be a big change but if you want to give it a shot, i've pushed my changes to the alt-nav branch, so you shooould be able to interpolate between the two branches
Author
Contributor

I could also just add an option for the left-side timeline shortcuts in this PR, and then for your timeline panel patch you can make that optional as well.

I could also just add an option for the left-side timeline shortcuts in this PR, and then for your timeline panel patch you can make that optional as well.

that would work as well, that sounds like the easiest way to do it

that would work as well, that sounds like the easiest way to do it
Author
Contributor

if you wanna, go for it

i was thinking that it might be a big change

but if you want to give it a shot, i've pushed my changes to the alt-nav branch, so you shooould be able to interpolate between the two branches

I'll take a look tonight. We can make everyone happy~

> if you wanna, go for it > > i was thinking that it might be a big change > > but if you want to give it a shot, i've pushed my changes to the alt-nav branch, so you shooould be able to interpolate between the two branches I'll take a look tonight. We can make everyone happy~
Author
Contributor

For the mobile nav, actually, should we just keep the timeline menu list and have the shortcuts option for the timeline panel be specific to the desktop view? My phone is a fairly hefty Pixel 5a, I'd imagine smaller phones wouldn't have room for the timeline name and the shortcuts unless we made it just the shortcuts only

For the mobile nav, actually, should we just keep the timeline menu list and have the shortcuts option for the timeline panel be specific to the desktop view? My phone is a fairly hefty Pixel 5a, I'd imagine smaller phones wouldn't have room for the timeline name and the shortcuts unless we made it just the shortcuts only

ah yeah actually i bumped into this, check IHBA on mobile - the timeline name disappears on smaller screens

ah yeah actually i bumped into this, check IHBA on mobile - the timeline name disappears on smaller screens
Author
Contributor

ah yeah actually i bumped into this, check IHBA on mobile - the timeline name disappears on smaller screens

Ah yeah that's really hard to use on mobile, I keep misclicking and scrolling to the top lol

> ah yeah actually i bumped into this, check IHBA on mobile - the timeline name disappears on smaller screens Ah yeah that's really hard to use on mobile, I keep misclicking and scrolling to the top lol
eris added the
WIP
label 2022-08-04 23:04:10 +00:00
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-07 04:54:27 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
97a37eb7a3
Merge i18n changes
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-07 04:54:39 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
a587d85324
Merge branch 'develop' into desktop-nav-redo
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-07 05:21:41 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
b91ae67bbb
Make new top nav links optional
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-07 05:42:46 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
b982c34694
Make nav panel icon margin optional
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-07 06:32:16 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
406c5dbb88
Move logout button to settings modal
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-07 06:34:50 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
201b91e8bf
Better padding for logout button
eris removed the
WIP
label 2022-08-07 06:41:11 +00:00
Author
Contributor

I didn't want to keep dealing with the logout button, which, regardless of gap, is always in the way and I rarely if ever click it intentionally but /often/ misclick it... This placement made sense to me, because putting it in the settings modal means when I do click it, it's intentional.

I also decided instead of maintaining one margin for my site, and a larger tablet-friendly margin for this PR, that others may also appreciate that option to either have .2em or .7em

And of course, as we discussed, I made all the new top nav shortcuts totally optional. Users can easily configure it to look how they're used to if they don't like it.

I hope that you like this PR, I think I've covered all the bases and my testing has been just fine.

I didn't want to keep dealing with the logout button, which, regardless of gap, is always in the way and I rarely if ever click it intentionally but /often/ misclick it... This placement made sense to me, because putting it in the settings modal means when I do click it, it's intentional. I also decided instead of maintaining one margin for my site, and a larger tablet-friendly margin for this PR, that others may also appreciate that option to either have `.2em` or `.7em` And of course, as we discussed, I made all the new top nav shortcuts totally optional. Users can easily configure it to look how they're used to if they don't like it. I hope that you like this PR, I think I've covered all the bases and my testing has been just fine.
eris added 1 commit 2022-08-07 07:10:34 +00:00
ci/woodpecker/pr/woodpecker Pipeline was successful Details
71a8d6b2b0
Make all new nav options expert/advanced options
Author
Contributor

The only thing this PR needs I think, is a check to see if an instance has a favicon at all.

However, I'm not quite sure how to do this.

Perhaps another way to solve this is to add a favicon by default, such as the Pleroma logo. Mastodon and Misskey both have this by default. But I also don't want to accidentally overwrite anyone's favicons if we go that route.

FG: Whenever you get a chance, I could use your input on this.

The only thing this PR needs I think, is a check to see if an instance has a favicon at all. However, I'm not quite sure how to do this. Perhaps another way to solve this is to add a favicon by default, such as the Pleroma logo. Mastodon and Misskey both have this by default. But I also don't want to accidentally overwrite anyone's favicons if we go that route. FG: Whenever you get a chance, I could use your input on this.
eris added the
WIP
label 2022-08-08 20:12:41 +00:00
eris removed the
WIP
label 2022-08-12 23:52:16 +00:00
Author
Contributor

I'm gonna say that the favicon thing should be addressed in a different way, ie FG adding a default favicon if she wants to, and say this is ready to merge

Part of this is because, 1 they can disable the option and nbd, and 2 instances that insist on not having a favicon federate broken images to every instance that loads instance favicons, with every post they make, and should be addressed with a default favicon outside this PR

I'm gonna say that the favicon thing should be addressed in a different way, ie FG adding a default favicon if she wants to, and say this is ready to merge Part of this is because, 1 they can disable the option and nbd, and 2 instances that insist on not having a favicon federate broken images to every instance that loads instance favicons, with every post they make, and should be addressed with a default favicon outside this PR

works nicely now! thank

works nicely now! thank
floatingghost merged commit ca0b730605 into develop 2022-08-14 23:24:59 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.