AkkomaGang/akkoma
AkkomaGang/akkoma
15
65
Fork 92
Code Issues 178 Pull requests 25 Projects 2 Releases 14 Packages Wiki Activity

add code of conduct #129

Merged
floatingghost merged 4 commits from :coc into develop 2022-08-03 10:55:12 +00:00
Conversation 9 Commits 4 Files changed 1 +24
Ghost commented 2022-07-30 21:46:47 +00:00
First-time contributor
Copy link

following recent developments

probably worth some discussion and opinions from core contributors

following recent developments probably worth some discussion and opinions from core contributors
👍 1
Ghost added 1 commit 2022-07-30 21:46:48 +00:00
add code of conduct
Some checks are pending
ci/woodpecker/pr/docs Pipeline is pending
Details
ci/woodpecker/pr/release Pipeline is pending
Details
ci/woodpecker/pr/test Pipeline is pending
Details
9fe30f5b5f
floatingghost commented 2022-07-31 21:44:17 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

i basically entirely agree with the document, i don't have any amendments to make

will give it a few days for comment but will adopt if nothing else is said

i basically entirely agree with the document, i don't have any amendments to make will give it a few days for comment but will adopt if nothing else is said
Beefox commented 2022-08-01 12:37:19 +00:00
First-time contributor
Copy link

I'm 100% for this, i have done a once over and agree with everything

I'm 100% for this, i have done a once over and agree with everything
fristi commented 2022-08-01 12:53:06 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

I've read the text, the only real issue is that this of course isn't written by a lawyer. So it might not be very watertight as far as rules go.

However I do have one issue with the first guideline:

This is not a professional space. Individuality is not only welcome, but encouraged. Professionalism asks marginalized individuals to censor themselves, and perform their identity in an inauthentic, unchallenging manner, which caters solely to those in power (namely rich, white, cisgender, heterosexual men). Seeking professionalism is antithetical to the goal of equity, and thus, these guidelines reject it.

I get why you'd use the words "professional space" here, referring to the typically toxic business environments. But keep in mind that one can also simply act in a professional manner, i.e. in line with their profession, usually boiling down to being responsible, ensuring quality and being respectful for your peers and colleagues. Or at least that's how I see it, but feel free to tell me if I'm wrong. But I do not view "suppressing individuality" as professional behavior. Rather the opposite.

I'm mostly concerned here with wording it correctly. Because from the get go it almost sounds to me like you're trying to say "we're all unprofessional here" which sounds a bit odd.

The rest of the guidelines are good as they are I think. I presume there's nothing else that should be added to it?

I've read the text, the only real issue is that this of course isn't written by a lawyer. So it might not be very watertight as far as rules go. However I do have one issue with the first guideline: > **This is not a professional space.** Individuality is not only welcome, but encouraged. Professionalism asks marginalized individuals to censor themselves, and perform their identity in an inauthentic, unchallenging manner, which caters solely to those in power (namely rich, white, cisgender, heterosexual men). Seeking professionalism is *antithetical* to the goal of equity, and thus, these guidelines reject it. I get why you'd use the words "professional space" here, referring to the typically toxic business environments. But keep in mind that one can also simply act in a professional manner, i.e. in line with their profession, usually boiling down to being responsible, ensuring quality and being respectful for your peers and colleagues. Or at least that's how I see it, but feel free to tell me if I'm wrong. But I do not view "suppressing individuality" as professional behavior. Rather the opposite. I'm mostly concerned here with wording it correctly. Because from the get go it almost sounds to me like you're trying to say "we're all unprofessional here" which sounds a bit odd. The rest of the guidelines are good as they are I think. I presume there's nothing else that should be added to it?
floatingghost reviewed 2022-08-01 13:09:00 +00:00
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +2,4 @@
The Akkoma project aims to be **enjoyable** for anyone to participate in, regardless of their identity or level of expertise. To achieve this, the community must create an environment which is **safe** and **equitable**; the following guidelines have been created with these goals in mind.
1. **This is not a professional space.** Individuality is not only welcome, but encouraged. Professionalism asks marginalized individuals to censor themselves, and perform their identity in an inauthentic, unchallenging manner, which caters solely to those in power (namely rich, white, cisgender, heterosexual men). Seeking professionalism is *antithetical* to the goal of equity, and thus, these guidelines reject it.
floatingghost commented 2022-08-01 13:09:00 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

from off-site feedback, this reads as a litttttttle aggressive, which whilst potentially not unjustified, might scare some people off

this paragraph in general might be something to rework to say "this is a casual space, we don't expect full professional behaviour but we do expect civility" or similar

from off-site feedback, this reads as a litttttttle aggressive, which whilst potentially not unjustified, might scare some people off this paragraph in general might be something to rework to say "this is a casual space, we don't expect full professional behaviour but we do expect civility" or similar
floatingghost reviewed 2022-08-01 13:31:49 +00:00
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
@ -0,0 +7,4 @@
- There will be queers, punks, femboys, drag queens, furries, hackers, kinksters, and all sorts of other people here. And the project will reflect that. If you don't like this, consider looking for Free Software projects [elsewhere](https://loose-files.keithhacks.cyou/img/trashcan.jpg).
2. **Treat individuals with respect.** Differing experiences and viewpoints deserve to be respected, and bigotry and harassment are not tolerated under any circumstances.
- Individuals should never be made to feel unsafe or unvalued due to their age, gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, disability, religion, appearance, education, level of expertise, or other factors.
floatingghost commented 2022-08-01 13:31:49 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

some additional off-site feedback: this could probably be codified into a positive-action rather than a negative-dont

like "Respect should be given regardless of [attribute list]"

some additional off-site feedback: this could probably be codified into a positive-action rather than a negative-dont like "Respect should be given regardless of [attribute list]"
floatingghost marked this conversation as resolved
Ghost commented 2022-08-01 14:21:53 +00:00
Author
First-time contributor
Copy link

@floatingghost gave you edit access to the branch; feel free to make any changes on your own

@floatingghost gave you edit access to the branch; feel free to make any changes on your own
floatingghost added 2 commits 2022-08-01 16:01:13 +00:00
clarify characteristic
Some checks are pending
ci/woodpecker/pr/docs Pipeline is pending
Details
ci/woodpecker/pr/release Pipeline is pending
Details
ci/woodpecker/pr/test Pipeline is pending
Details
a879197ef7
floatingghost commented 2022-08-01 16:02:08 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

updated in line with comments

i think that's a lot cleaner

thoughts?

updated in line with comments i think that's a lot cleaner thoughts?
👍 1
norm commented 2022-08-01 19:02:54 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

I have no complaint about the document as it is. Glad seeing base expectations being made here.

I have no complaint about the document as it is. Glad seeing base expectations being made here.
Ghost commented 2022-08-02 07:50:08 +00:00
Author
First-time contributor
Copy link

i'm fine with either version, lgtm

i'm fine with either version, lgtm
thomate commented 2022-08-02 10:04:52 +00:00
First-time contributor
Copy link

This version looks good to me!

Though the footer should probably be revised from

This document was created by ~keith as part of punks default repository template,

To something more like

This document is derived from the one created by ...

This version looks good to me! Though the footer should probably be revised from > This document was created by ~keith as part of punks default repository template, To something more like > This document is derived from the one created by ...
spla commented 2022-08-02 10:06:30 +00:00
First-time contributor
Copy link

looks fine to me!

looks fine to me!
floatingghost added 1 commit 2022-08-03 10:54:49 +00:00
Fix attribution line
Some checks are pending
ci/woodpecker/pr/docs Pipeline is pending
Details
ci/woodpecker/pr/release Pipeline is pending
Details
ci/woodpecker/pr/test Pipeline is pending
Details
8bb076d8a1
floatingghost merged commit 6e9126a794 into develop 2022-08-03 10:55:12 +00:00
floatingghost referenced this pull request from a commit 2022-08-03 10:55:12 +00:00
add code of conduct (#129)
Ghost deleted branch coc 2022-08-03 15:11:58 +00:00
rat referenced this pull request from a commit 2024-02-25 20:33:29 +00:00
add code of conduct (#129)
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
approved, awaiting change

   
bug

Something is not working

  
configuration

This requires config changes

  
documentation

This is about human-readable docs

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
extremely low priority

   
feature request

Something new?

  
Fix it yourself

Support has been attempted

  
help wanted

Need some help

  
invalid

Something is wrong

  
mastodon_api

   
needs docs

   
needs tests

   
not a bug

   
planned

   
pleroma_api

   
privacy

   
question

More information is needed

  
static_fe

   
triage

   
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
approved, awaiting change
bug
configuration
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
extremely low priority
feature request
Fix it yourself
help wanted
invalid
mastodon_api
needs docs
needs tests
not a bug
planned
pleroma_api
privacy
question
static_fe
triage
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
7 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: AkkomaGang/akkoma#129
No description provided.
Delete branch ":coc"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?