This was accidentally broken in c8e0f7848b
due to a one-letter mistake in the plug option name and an absence of
tests. Therefore it was once again possible to serve e.g. Javascript or
CSS payloads via uploads and emoji.
However due to other protections it was still NOT possible for anyone to
serve any payload with an ActivityPub Content-Type. With the CSP policy
hardening from previous JS payload exloits predating the Content-Type
sanitisation, there is currently no known way of abusing this weakened
Content-Type sanitisation, but should be fixed regardless.
This commit fixes the option name and adds tests to ensure
such a regression doesn't occur again in the future.
Reported-by: Lain Soykaf <lain@lain.com>
When note editing support was added, it was omitted to strip internal
fields from edited notes and their history.
This was uncovered due to Mastodon inlining the like count as a "likes"
collection conflicting with our internal "likes" list causing validation
failures. In a spot check with likes/like_count it was not possible to
inject those internal fields into the local db via Update, but this
was not extensively tested for all fields and avenues.
Similarly address normalisation did not normalise addressing in the
object history, although this was never at risk of being exploitable.
The revision history of the Pleroma MR adding edit support reveals
recusrive stripping was intentionally avoided, since it will end up
removing e.g. emoji from outgoing activities. This appears to still
be true. However, all current internal fields ("pleroma_interal"
appears to be unused) contain data already publicised otherwise anyway.
In the interest of fixing a federation bug (and at worst potential data
injection) quickly outgoing stripping is left non-recursive for now.
Of course the ultimate fix here is to not mix remote and internal data
into the same map in the first place, but unfortunately having a single
map of all truth is a core assumption of *oma's AP doc processing.
Changing this is a masive undertaking and not suitable for providing
a short-term fix.
We expect most requests to be made for the actual canonical ID,
so check this one first (starting without query headers matching the
predominant albeit spec-breaking version).
Also avoid unnecessary rerewrites of the digest header on each route
alias by just setting it once before iterating through aliases.
This matches behaviour prioir to the SigningKey migration
and the expected semantics of the http_signatures lib.
Additionally add a min interval paramter, to avoid
refetch floods on bugs causing incompatible signatures
(like e.g. currently with Bridgy)
User updates broke with the migration to separate signing keys
since user data carries signing keys but we didn't allow the
association data to be updated.
Previously there were mainly two attack vectors:
- for raw keys the owner <-> key mapping wasn't verified at all
- keys were retrieved with refetching allowed
and only the top-level ID was sanitised while
usually keys are but a subobject
This reintroduces public key checks in the user actor,
previously removed in 9728e2f8f7
but now adapted to account for the new mapping mechanism.
Notably at least two instances were not properly guarded from path
traversal attack before and are only now fixed by using SafeZip:
- frontend installation did never check for malicious paths.
But given a malicious froontend could already, e.g. steal
all user tokens even without this, in the real world
admins should only use frontends from trusted sources
and the practical implications are minimal
- the emoji pack update/upload API taking a ZIP file
did not protect against path traversal. While atm
only admins can use these emoji endpoints, emoji
packs are typically considered "harmless" and used
without prior verification from various sources.
Thus this appears more concerning.
This will replace all the slightly different safety workarounds at
different ZIP handling sites and ensure safety is actually consistently
enforced everywhere while also making code cleaner and easiert to
follow.
The first collection page is (sometimes?) inlined
which caused crashes when attempting to log the fetch failure.
But there’s no need to fetch and we can treat it like the other inline collection
And for now treat partial fetches as a success, since for all
current users partial collection data is better than no data at all.
If an error occurred while fetching a page, this previously
returned a bogus {:ok, {:error, _}} success, causing the error
to be attached to the object as an reply list subsequently
leading to the whole post getting rejected during validation.
Also the pinned collection caller did not actually handle
the preexisting error case resulting in process crashes.
Oban cataches crashes to handle job failure and retry,
thus it never bubbles up all the way and nothing is logged by default.
For better debugging, catch and log any crashes.
The object lookup is later repeated in the validator, but due to
caching shouldn't incur any noticeable performance impact.
It’s actually preferable to check here, since it avoids the otherwise
occuring user lookup and overhead from starting and aborting a
transaction
Most of them actually only accept either activities or a
non-activity object later; querying both is then a waste
of resources and may create false positives.
The only thing this does is changing the updated_at field of the user.
Afaict this came to be because prior to pins federating this was split
into two functions, one of which created a changeset, the other applying
a given changeset. When this was merged the bits were just copied into
place.
User.get_or_fetch_by_(apid|nickname) are the only external users of fetch_and_prepare_user_from_ap_id,
thus there’s no point in duplicating logging, expecially not at error level.
Currently (duplicated) _not_found errors for users make up the bulk of my logs
and are created almost every second. Deleted users are a common occurence and not
worth logging outside of debug
To facilitate this ObjectValidator.fetch_actor_and_object is adapted to
return an informative error. Otherwise we’d be unable to make an
informed decision on retrying or not later. There’s no point in
retrying to fetch MRF-blocked stuff or private posts for example.
This is the only user of fetch_actor_and_object which previously just
always preteneded to be successful. For all the activity types handled
here, we absolutely need the referenced object to be able to process it
(other than Announce whether or not processing those activity types for
unknown remote objects is desirable in the first place is up for debate)
All other users of the similar fetch_actor already properly check success.
Note, this currently lumps all reolv failure reasons together,
so even e.g. boosts of MRF rejected posts will still exhaust all
retries. The following commit improves on this.
It makes decisions based on error sources harder since all possible
nesting levels need to be checked for. As shown by the return values
handled in the receiver worker something else still nests those,
but this is a first start.
This value is currently only used by Prometheus metrics
but (after optimisng the peer query inthe preceeding commit)
the most costly part of instance stats.
