this didn't actually _do_ anything in the past,
the users would be prevented from accessing the resource,
but they shouldn't be able to even create them
Until now it was returning a 500 because the upload plug were going
through the changeset and ending in the JSON encoder, which raised
because struct has to @derive the encoder.
Objects who got updated would just pass through several of the MRF policies, undoing moderation in some situations.
In the relevant cases we now check not only for Create activities, but also Update activities.
I checked which ones checked explicitly on type Create using `grep '"type" => "Create"' lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/*`.
The following from that list have not been changed:
* lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/follow_bot_policy.ex
* Not relevant for moderation
* lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/keyword_policy.ex
* Already had a test for Update
* lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/object_age_policy.ex
* In practice only relevant when fetching old objects (e.g. through Like or Announce). These are always wrapped in a Create.
* lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/reject_non_public.ex
* We don't allow changing scope with Update, so not relevant here
Objects who got updated would just pass the TagPolicy, undoing the moderation that was set in place for the Actor.
Now we check not only for Create activities, but also Update activities.
makes static-fe look more like pleroma-fe, with the stylesheets matching pleroma-dark and pleroma-light based on `prefers-color-scheme`.
- [x] navbar
- [x] about sidebar
- [x] background image
- [x] statuses
- [x] "reply to" or "edited" tags
- [x] accounts
- [x] show more / show less
- [x] posts / with replies / media / followers / following
- [x] followers/following would require user card snippets
- [x] admin/bot indicators
- [x] attachments
- [x] nsfw attachments
- [x] fontawesome icons
- [x] clean up and sort css
- [x] add pleroma-light
- [x] replace hardcoded strings
also i forgot
- [x] repeated headers
how it looks + sneak peek at statuses:
Co-authored-by: Sol Fisher Romanoff <sol@solfisher.com>
Reviewed-on: #236
Co-authored-by: sfr <sol@solfisher.com>
Co-committed-by: sfr <sol@solfisher.com>
Only real change here is making MRF rejects log as debug instead of info (#234)
I don't know if it's the best way to do it, but it seems it's just MRF using this and almost always this is intended.
The rest are just minor docs changes and syncing the restricted nicknames stuff.
I compiled and ran my changes with Docker and they all work.
Co-authored-by: r3g_5z <june@terezi.dev>
Reviewed-on: #313
Co-authored-by: @r3g_5z@plem.sapphic.site <june@girlboss.ceo>
Co-committed-by: @r3g_5z@plem.sapphic.site <june@girlboss.ceo>
Close#304.
Notes:
- This patch was made on top of Pleroma develop, so I created a separate cachex worker for request signature actions, instead of Akkoma's instance cache. If that is a merge blocker, I can attempt to move logic around for that.
- Regarding the `has_request_signatures: true -> false` state transition: I think that is a higher level thing (resetting instance state on new instance actor key) which is separate from the changes relevant to this one.
Co-authored-by: Luna <git@l4.pm>
Reviewed-on: #312
Co-authored-by: @luna@f.l4.pm <akkoma@l4.pm>
Co-committed-by: @luna@f.l4.pm <akkoma@l4.pm>
Changes follow_operation schema to use BooleanLike instead of :boolean so that strings like "0" and "1" (used by mastodon.py) can be accepted. Rest of file uses the same. For more info please see https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/issues/2999
(I'm also sending this here as I'm not hopeful about upstream not ignoring it)
Co-authored-by: ave <ave@ave.zone>
Reviewed-on: #301
Co-authored-by: ave <ave@noreply.akkoma>
Co-committed-by: ave <ave@noreply.akkoma>
- Drop Expect-CT
Expect-CT has been redundant since 2018 when Certificate Transparency became mandated and required for all CAs and browsers. This header is only implemented in Chrome and is now deprecated. HTTP header analysers do not check this anymore as this is enforced by default. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Expect-CT
- Raise HSTS to 2 years and explicitly preload
The longer age for HSTS, the better. Header analysers prefer 2 years over 1 year now as free TLS is very common using Let's Encrypt.
For HSTS to be fully effective, you need to submit your root domain (domain.tld) to https://hstspreload.org. However, a requirement for this is the "preload" directive in Strict-Transport-Security. If you do not have "preload", it will reject your domain.
- Drop X-Download-Options
This is an IE8-era header when Adobe products used to use the IE engine for making outbound web requests to embed webpages in things like Adobe Acrobat (PDFs). Modern apps are using Microsoft Edge WebView2 or Chromium Embedded Framework. No modern browser checks or header analyser check for this.
- Set base-uri to 'none'
This is to specify the domain for relative links (`<base>` HTML tag). pleroma-fe does not use this and it's an incredibly niche tag.
I use all of these myself on my instance by rewriting the headers with zero problems. No breakage observed.
I have not compiled my Elixr changes, but I don't see why they'd break.
Co-authored-by: r3g_5z <june@terezi.dev>
Reviewed-on: #294
Co-authored-by: @r3g_5z@plem.sapphic.site <june@terezi.dev>
Co-committed-by: @r3g_5z@plem.sapphic.site <june@terezi.dev>
The header name was Report-To, not Reply-To.
In any case, that's now being changed to the Reporting-Endpoints HTTP
Response Header.
https://w3c.github.io/reporting/#headerhttps://github.com/w3c/reporting/issues/177
CanIUse says the Report-To header is still supported by current Chrome
and friends.
https://caniuse.com/mdn-http_headers_report-to
It doesn't have any data for the Reporting-Endpoints HTTP header, but
this article says Chrome 96 supports it.
https://web.dev/reporting-api/
(Even though that's come out one year ago, that's not compatible with
Network Error Logging which's still using the Report-To version of the
API)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Citharel <tcit@tcit.fr>
Simple fix for LDAP user registration. I'm not sure what changed but I managed to get Akkoma running in a debug session and figured out it was missing a match for an extra value at the end. I don't know Elixir all that well so I'm not sure if this was the correct way to do it... but it works. :)
Reviewed-on: #229
Co-authored-by: nullobsi <me@nullob.si>
Co-committed-by: nullobsi <me@nullob.si>
The problem was double. On the one hand, the function didn't actually return what was in the DB.
On the other hand the test was flaky because it used NaiveDateTime.utc_now() so test could fail or pass depending on a difference of microseconds.
Both are fixed now.
